Current Issue
Volume
32
year
2026
Issue
2

Archive

AUTHOR'S GUIDELINES

ABSTRACT GUIDELINES

SUBMIT AN ARTICLE

SCIENTIFIC AND RESEARCH PROFILE

PUBLICATION ETHICS

PEER REVIEW POLICY

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING

EDITORIAL BOARD

INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL BOARD

PUBLISHER


Economic Alternatives articles are published open access under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 user licence

ADDRESS OF THE EDITORIAL OFFICE

ISSN (print): 1312-7462
ISSN (online): 2367-9409
4 issues per year

The authors' statements reflect their personal opinions and do not involve the editors of the journal.

The Editorial Board is committed to open science and free access to scientific publications. No Article Processing Charges apply.

The Publisher provides instant free access to the work and permits any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. All submitted manuscripts will be checked for plagiarism.

Typeset by:

Academic Publishing House of UNWE 

Printed by:

UNWE Printing House



0.9
2024CiteScore
 
29th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Level of Corruption, Institutions and Economic Growth: Comparative Analysis from Developed and Developing Countries Economic Alternatives
year
2026
Issue
2

Level of Corruption, Institutions and Economic Growth: Comparative Analysis from Developed and Developing Countries

Abstract

 This study aims to analyze the factors influencing corruption levels across developed and developing countries, focusing on the roles of institutional quality, sustainable economic growth, income per capita, and human development in shaping corruption outcomes. The study also investigates the comparative differences in corruption levels between these two groups of countries. The analysis utilizes a quantitative approach based on secondary data from 27 European Union countries, covering the period from 2010 to 2022. Using a 13-year panel dataset of 351 observations, the study applies econometric models suited for panel data— specifically, fixed effects and random effects models. Findings reveal that institutional quality significantly reduces corruption levels (B=0.58), while human development shows a positive association with corruption (B=11.56). Conversely, income per capita exhibits a negative relationship with corruption (B=- 0.98). The fixed effects model shows a high explanatory power (R-squared=77.61%) and confirms no multicollinearity (VIF=1.59) and homoscedasticity (p=0.6636). Results also highlight that developed countries experience higher corruption levels compared to developing countries (B=3.97).

Keywords

economic growth, corruption, Institutional Quality, Income per Capita, Developed and Developing Countries
Download EA.2026.2.09.pdf