Current Issue
Volume
31
year
2025
Issue
4

Archive

AUTHOR'S GUIDELINES

ABSTRACT GUIDELINES

SUBMIT AN ARTICLE

SCIENTIFIC AND RESEARCH PROFILE

PUBLICATION ETHICS

PEER REVIEW POLICY

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING

EDITORIAL BOARD

INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL BOARD

PUBLISHER


Economic Alternatives articles are published open access under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 user licence

ADDRESS OF THE EDITORIAL OFFICE

ISSN (print): 1312-7462
ISSN (online): 2367-9409
4 issues per year

The authors' statements reflect their personal opinions and do not involve the editors of the journal.

The Editorial Board is committed to open science and free access to scientific publications. No Article Processing Charges apply.

The Publisher provides instant free access to the work and permits any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. All submitted manuscripts will be checked for plagiarism.

Typeset by:

Academic Publishing House of UNWE 

Printed by:

UNWE Printing House



0.9
2024CiteScore
 
29th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Legitimizing Private Land Ownership in the Ottoman Empire: State Policy vs Economic Thought Economic Alternatives
year
2023
Issue
1

Legitimizing Private Land Ownership in the Ottoman Empire: State Policy vs Economic Thought

Abstract

In the second half of the nineteenth century, the ideas of both the liberals and the German Historical School (laissez-faire vs. protectionism) began to find an increasingly receptive audience in the Ottoman Empire. This was accompanied by a radical change in the approach to the concept of private land ownership. This article aims at discovering traces of this change in the economic literature produced by Ottoman political economists and social thinkers of the second half of the nineteenth century. The otherwise contrasting approaches of liberal writers, such as Serandi Arsizen (Sarantis Archigenes), Sak?zl? Ohannes Efendi and Mehmet Cavid Bey, on the one hand, and of the protectionist writers, such as Ahmet Mithat Efendi and Musa Akyigitzade, who were inspired more by the German Historical School (and by Friedrich List, in particular), on the other, are examined in order to display similar perceptions of  private land ownership in Ottoman economic thought. State-induced private propertization of land received strong support from Ottoman intellectuals from different schools of thought, and the inviolability of property rights in land is considered sine qua non for economic development.

Keywords

economic development, property, 19th century, the Ottoman Empire, land
Download EA.2023.1.04.pdf