Current Issue
Volume
30
year
2024
Issue
1

Archive

AUTHOR'S GUIDELINES

ABSTRACT GUIDELINES

SUBMIT AN ARTICLE

SCIENTFIC AND RESEARCH PROFILE

PUBLICATION ETHICS

PEER REVIEW POLICY

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING

EDITORIAL BOARD

INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL BOARD

PUBLISHER


Economic Alternatives articles are published open access under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 user licence

ADDRESS OF THE EDITORIAL OFFICE

ISSN (print): 1312-7462
ISSN (online): 2367-9409
4 issues per year


The conceptions of the authors express their personal opinion and do not engage the editors of the journal.

The Editorial Board is committed to open science and free access to scientific publications.

No Article Processing Charges apply. The Publisher allows for immediate free access to the work and permits any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. 

Every manuscript received will be checked for plagiarism.

Typeset by:

UNWE Publishing Complex

Printed by:

UNWE Publishing Complex

Williamson’s Institutional Analysis of Investments: A Case Study of Bulgarian Forestry Economic Alternatives
year
2023
Issue
3

Williamson’s Institutional Analysis of Investments: A Case Study of Bulgarian Forestry

Abstract

Fixed Capital Formation in Bulgarian forestry in 2016 and 2017 amounts respectively to 4.90 million EUR and 10.37 million EUR, which assigns Bulgarian forestry to the unsatisfactory 14th place from 15 EU member states by level of investments. In this respect an attempt is made to answer the question: ‘Which are the reasons for insufficient investments in forestry in Bulgaria?’. The response to that question is searched by means O. Williamson’s four level institutional analysis. Based on a questionnaire survey among specialists working in forestry and hypotheses testing through ?2-analysis it is established that among the main reasons for insufficient investment in Bulgarian forestry are some market failures as rent seeking and opportunism. Furthermore by means of Cramer’s coefficients it is established that the link between investments and both market failures is strong in terms of strength. According to 80.3% of the inquired specialists, the limitation of market failures in forestry is possible through increasing the share of stewardships activities carried out by territorial departments of state enterprises with their own forestry equipment and workers.

Keywords

investments, market failures, state forest enterprises, representative sample
Download EA.2023.3.09.pdf