Current Issue
Volume
30
year
2024
Issue
1

Archive

AUTHOR'S GUIDELINES

ABSTRACT GUIDELINES

SUBMIT AN ARTICLE

SCIENTFIC AND RESEARCH PROFILE

PUBLICATION ETHICS

PEER REVIEW POLICY

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING

EDITORIAL BOARD

INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL BOARD

PUBLISHER


Economic Alternatives articles are published open access under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 user licence

ADDRESS OF THE EDITORIAL OFFICE

ISSN (print): 1312-7462
ISSN (online): 2367-9409
4 issues per year


The conceptions of the authors express their personal opinion and do not engage the editors of the journal.

The Editorial Board is committed to open science and free access to scientific publications.

No Article Processing Charges apply. The Publisher allows for immediate free access to the work and permits any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. 

Every manuscript received will be checked for plagiarism.

Typeset by:

UNWE Publishing Complex

Printed by:

UNWE Publishing Complex

Understanding Ethical Consumption: Types and Antecedents Economic Alternatives
year
2017
Issue
4

Understanding Ethical Consumption: Types and Antecedents

Abstract

Ethical consumption incorporates a variety of consumer practices, which have been fragmentarily investigated, so far. This research study introduces the overall concept of Ethical Consumption (EC) with the concurrent investigation of its three types, namely Positive, Negative and Discursive Ethical Consumption (PEC, NEC, DEC). The demographic, attitudinal and psychographic antecedents of each type were examined. The results of a survey conducted in Thessaloniki urban area, Greece with a stratified sample of 420 consumers are presented. The results revealed that Greeks do not frequently engage in any of the three types. The analyses of the results indicated the demographic, attitudinal and psychographic antecedents of the EC types and enlightened the insights and inter-relations in the overall domain. PEC is endorsed by middle aged, highly educated women, who receive relatively high family incomes. Consumers, who are less indifferent to ethical consumption issues, less sceptical about ethical products, more willing and capable of exercising their political interests and influencing the political system, are more likely to get engaged in PEC. NEC is endorsed by highly educated consumers, who feel more politically powerful, less ethically indifferent and hold higher post-materialist values than their counterparts. DEC is endorsed by young, post-graduate professionals. Consumers, who are less indifferent to ethical consumption issues, less sceptical about ethical products, less materialists and feel more politically powerful, are more likely to get engaged in DEC. 

Keywords

Ethical Consumption, Positive Buying, Boycotting, Discursive Activities, Ethical Unconcern, Policy Control, Materialism/Post-materialism
Download 8_EAlternativi_english_4_2017.pdf